The point and the ambition of this website is to build a comprehensive and coherent worldview that will help us all to live agreeably and in harmony with each other and with our fellow creatures for as long as the Earth will support our kind of life. For if we played our cards right – which for the most part means doing conceptually simple things well – then, even at this late hour, with catastrophe threatening on every side —
We and our fellow creatures should still be looking forward to a long and glorious future. We should be thinking seriously about the next million years – for starters.
That we should now be wondering whether we and other species can survive in a tolerable state even through the rest of this century is not only tragic (could there be worse?) but is absurd. Right now, though, the world is in such dire straits that to turn things around we need —
To re-think everything we do and take for granted from first, “bedrock” principles – and to re-think everything in the light of everything else.
The bedrock principles I suggest are those of morality – which aspires to tell us what it is right to do; and ecology – which aspires to tell us what it is necessary and possible to do. Political and economic so-called “principles” are mere ideologies. Overall, the necessary re-think amounts to nothing less than a Renaissance, which literally means “re-birth”. We need indeed to be radical, in the proper sense: to get back to the roots.
But in practice the world is led and shaped by a virtual oligarchy of governments, corporates, financiers, and their selected intellectual and expert advisers – and we cannot expect that oligarchy to initiate the Renaissance we need and to carry it through. For the most part the powers-that-be are wedded to the status quo, which they helped to create and which, in practice, is largely geared to their own needs and predilections. Accordingly, many or most in high places see no reason for a radical change of direction. And so –
If we want the Renaissance to happen, then we – people at large; Ordinary Joes and Jos – have to bring it about.
The method, though — the essence of Renaissance as opposed to Revolution – is not to have a fight with the powers-that-be, for we surely should do all that is possible to avoid violence, but –
To rebuild the world we want to see for ourselves, in situ, and leave the status quo to wither on the vine.
Renaissance implies cross-the-board transformation: metamorphosis (change of form); and metanoia (change of mindset). But the road to Renaissance has to begin somewhere, and the most obvious and fruitful place to begin is with food and agriculture. Agriculture sits right at the heart of all the world’s affairs, both human and non-human, even if governments like Britain’s don’t realise that. Unless we put agriculture to rights, then everything else worthwhile that we might attempt to do is compromised. Yet we can’t put agriculture to rights unless we have an appropriate economy and laws to support it; and we won’t have an appropriate economy and laws unless we have governments that see the need for change and have some idea of what needs doing, and an electorate that sees the need for a new kind of government — and new ways of installing what we need.
It’s a huge task, and it sounds like a version of Catch 22 – for we can’t it seems do anything properly until we have done everything else. Yet the beginnings of Renaissance are already in place. Many millions of people worldwide, and many thousands of organizations, are already on the case, and creating the kind of enterprises that the world really needs, and some at least of the necessary support structures, despite the status quo. With a little more coherence, there surely are enough people and enough good ideas to form a critical mass and change the world around, even at this late hour.
The task sounds endlessly complex, and is, yet I suggest we should never stop thinking about it, and acting upon it. Happily, though, despite the complexities, the necessary agenda can be summarized in a simple diagram:
THE DIAGRAM

The diagram breaks down the things we need to think about and act upon into twelve subject areas, shown here as “balloons”, arranged in four tiers. The lines between the balloons indicate that all the balloons must interact directly with all the others. Thus, in particular, economics must take account of and indeed be geared to the demands of morality and ecology. The economy cannot, as now, be treated simply as a way of increasing material wealth. Science should never be taught without regard for the philosophy of science. And the much-neglected and all-but-abandoned pursuit of metaphysics should be all-pervasive.
The top tier of the diagram defines THE GOAL: what we should be trying to achieve and why. Until someone comes up with something better I suggest our Goal should be:
“To create convivial societies, with personal fulfilment, within a flourishing biosphere”
All three are important – society; the individual; and the biosphere as a whole. Most societies and political and economic theories seem to neglect at least one of the essential requirements – which always, in reality, compromises all three. Indeed, more generally, most governments fail miserably to spell out what they are really trying to achieve. Most seem content with slogans such as “Put America first” or “Take back control” and crude economic formulae such as “Growth”. Very few indeed in the modern world have ever ranked concern for the biosphere — the living world — alongside our human ambitions.
Note “fulfilment” rather than the usual “happiness” – which all too easily degenerates into mere hedonism; and “biosphere” — living world, or natural world – rather than the usual “environment” which literally means “surroundings” – stage scenery – and in the modern, neoliberal mindset really means “real estate”.
With the Goal in mind we need to take ACTION, and this includes all technologies. Some technologies – the kind that E F Schumacher called “appropriate” – bring us further towards the stated Goal, and some lead us further away. We need to forge a new philosophy of technology to help us decide which is which.
All technologies are relevant but the one that we really have to get right (and in many respects are getting most wrong) is Agriculture, which must be complemented by an appropriate Food Culture. Agriculture is at the heart of all the world’s affairs, both human and non-human. If we get it right, then the Goal at least becomes possible. If we get it wrong, then everything else we may aspire to achieve is compromised. The kind of farming that is appropriate to our world I call Enlightened Agriculture, often shortened for PR purposes to Real Farming. Just to anticipate, the kind of high-input industrial agriculture that is now favoured by the powers-that-be is in many important respects the precise opposite of what is really needed – and is heavily implicated in all the world’s problems, from climate change to economic inequality.
But we can never create or support the kind of technologies we really need, farming or otherwise, unless we have an appropriate INFRASTRUCTURE. The infrastructure – the organization that holds the whole society together, or should do — has three major components: Governance, the Economy, and the Law. More on this later; suffice to say here that the infrastructure is the intermediary – the medium through which we are able to translate our aspirations into useful action. That is, its task is to provide the mechanisms by which we can realize the goals of conviviality, fulfilment, and a flourishing biosphere. Present systems leave us a long way short. But then, no system that I know about has ever been designed expressly with those Goals in mind.
Lastly, all our ideas and hence the way we live and treat each other and the world at large are shaped or indeed determined by our underlying MINDSET: the sum total of the things we think we know or take for granted, all of which shape and are shaped by our attitudes. I won’t say that “attitude is all” but it is what lawyers call a sine qua non. What we care about, and whether we care about anything at all, and what we choose to do about the things we do care about – all depend in the end on our attitude.
Everything – the history of our species and of our society; our own personal experiences, in effect from the moment of conception; our education, formal and otherwise – combine to shape our mindset. But among all these influences I reckon we can reasonably pick out four: our sense of Morality, which aspires to tell us what is right and wrong; Science, defined broadly, which probes the mechanisms of life and the universe, and hence aspires to tell us what is; Metaphysics – which is much neglected but in truth may be the most important pursuit of all, which many suggest addresses life’s “ultimate questions”, including why there is a universe at all. Finally, The Arts, which may be seen as the human imagination in full flight, and which seek to express in the most memorable ways whatever the imagination reveals. The arts take us to places we wouldn’t otherwise have gone — and these excursions are vital.
Overall, to put the matter portentously, we might say that the grand ambition of this website is:
“To help to construct what might reasonably be called “the Universal Wisdom” and to apply the Universal Wisdom to everyday life”
Or, in more detail:
“To apply the bedrock principles of morality and ecology, underpinned by the absolute presuppositions of metaphysics, to politics, the economy, and the law, and so to our attitudes and ways of life and everything that we do”
In short, the task before us – humanity – is:
“To devise ways of living that are rooted in the bedrock principles of morality and ecology, and are geared to the goals of conviviality, personal fulfilment, and harmony with the natural world”
In this website I want to explore what all this entails, taking the individual subject areas – the balloons – one by one; though always seeking to consider each area of thought in the light of all the others so as to create an all-embracing, coherent worldview – but one that continues to grow and evolve. We must not yet again enmire ourselves in dogma! The task is never-ending since perfection is impossible – but it’s a vital undertaking if we seriously care about the future.
More to the point, though, I want this website to become a forum for everyone who cares to take an interest to share their thoughts, helping to refine the “Universal Wisdom”, helping to forge new relationships, and leading to further and ever more decisive action. The Goal is of course utopian and utopia by definition is always out of reach; but over time we could and should move ever closer to it. And that, rather than increase in wealth and power, is what “progress” really ought to mean.
So please add your thoughts by using the comments section at the bottom of each blog post or page.
I intend this website to complement the College for Real Farming and Food Culture, which I helped to set up. But this is my own personal take on things.
Further thoughts
Not much scope for optimism – but never lose hope!
Share this article: A fellow journalist, Barrie Lees, has written in pessimistic vein to tell me that my plans for A 21st Century Renaissance (April 2 2025) are unrealistic, or indeed forlorn (see comment number 7). Here’s my response: Dear Barrie, I’m not saying the Renaissance will in any sense be easy. I am merely … Read more
A 21st Century Renaissance
Share this article: Proposal for a new Course to help lay the foundations of a People-led Global Renaissance My grand ambition is to provide an outline of a Life Strategy – actions, ideas, and attitudes – that would, if acted upon, enable human beings and our fellow creatures to live agreeably on this planet for … Read more
The road to renaissance
Nothing short of a cross-the-board transformation – Renaissance — is needed to rescue the world from its present decline. But, says Colin Tudge, we first need to lay the foundations.
Only a people-led cross- board renaissance can save us now
Share this article: An attempt to summarize 50 years or so of contemplation in one 20-minute narrative on what we need to do, and can do, to pull humanity and the world back from the brink of oblivion. By Colin Tudge The world is in a dreadful mess – who can doubt this? — but … Read more
The essential ingredients of the Global Renaissance
Share this article: A checklist of the six very big ideas that we need to develop and act upon if we are to save ourselves and the rest of the world from what at the moment looks like an inevitable meltdown. These notes are meant to accompany the new videos – the five conversations on … Read more
What the mind-shift entails
Share this article: My excellent friend Ziauddin Sardar – a former colleague from New Scientist and now founder and editor of Critical Muslim – has summarized the mind-shift that’s needed as follows: “We need to move from disciplinary enclaves to integration of knowledge. This journey begins with the acknowledgement of (a) the limitation of disciplinary … Read more
The meaning of “radical”
Share this article: Within days of her dubious appointment as Britain’s Prime Minister in September 2022 Liz Truss and her chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng produced a budget-that-wasn’t-a-budget — which was widely condemned by experts the world over, and by people-at-large. Ah, she said, but we are merely being “radical” – which is necessary to get us … Read more
5 responses to “The ingredients of Renaissance”
-
Thank you Colin for spelling all this out so clearly – it’s very much in line with what Neil and I had in mind when we started Commonwork at Bore Place, and what current trustees are aiming for. We need a mass of initiatives in this direction if we are to find the way forward and actually embark on it, and I do feel hopeful that many such initiatives are happening at grass-roots level, unsung by the unsympathetic media. Radical democracy!
-
Colin – my heart sang as I read your ‘manifesto’ (if you’ll pardon the word). You articulate all the issues I (and others) have struggled with in critiquing the world’s problems and provide a cogent framework for restoring a sustainable future. Most of all it recognises the value of love and embraces the imperfections of our human selves. I look forward to learning more and doing my bit to grow the base.
-
I will reiterate on the comment from Richard above, as “my heart sang” upon discovering this website and reading your introduction and this recipe for thinking a new Renaissance. There are so many thinkers articulating similar ideas, and there are also activists working towards pieces of these ideas, yet it is very difficult to find cohesion. I think a big piece of this for me may lies in “ego,” specifically human ego of course. I’m hoping this is addressed as I work through your ideas. We need a certain degree of ego for survival, but the degree to which it has created so much division in our human societies can be overwhelming to confront. I look forward to learning more.
-
Such an important and well timed summary of what is needed for us and the world to thrive both now and in the future
-
Dear Colin
We have many things to thank you for, not least for being a pioneering voice and long distance runner for enlightened agriculture. It is great cause for celebration that this has now become an influential movement (despite your name for this type of farming not being the one which has caught on), and you have been one of its leaders for decades.
We have no time to waste in delivering a coherent and unifying vision which can mobilise people en masse to Renaissance. The word is wonderfully chosen, for what is needed is much more all encompassing than seizing power – it is the formation of a new way of human life. Besides, there are very good arguments that power structures themselves shape the characters and actions of those who control them – and we need leadership that is of a completely different kind to what we are accustomed to suffering. Our task is as you say “To rebuild the world we want to see for ourselves, in situ, and leave the status quo to wither on the vine.”
That is no easy feat, mind you, and it very much begs the question of means. I receive your Great Re-think as certainly more than a call to contemplation – it is a call to lay down a vision which can be a foundation for action. So on this basis I will ask: How can we establish an alternative way of living that is strong enough to withstand the inevitable pressure from the existing power structures to conform to the status quo? Firstly, how do we overcome the fact that the general population (even in the wealthiest countries) is completely hamstrung by the overwhelming labour of keeping ourselves and loved one’s afloat, carrying out all the administration we are now expected to do for both government and companies and trying to live at least a minimally enjoyable existence? When our heads are just above water we cannot leap for the shore – the time and energy to be part of creating an alternative way of life is just not available for most people, even if the desire is strong. We are actively prevented from freeing ourselves up by the law as it stands that prohibits us from spending a couple of years building our own dwelling on a nice little patch of farmland and growing food to feed our family and community, instead of working 30 years to pay off a mortgage or indefinitely paying the rent which takes up 60% of our working hours. Perhaps this is a question for another book: How do we rebuild the world in situ without seizing power?
_
One the great virtues of the foundations you have laid is its very long-term thinking. If we are to take the concept of the Anthropocene seriously (and adherence to any explanation of climate change as anthropogenic requires that we do) then we must be absolutely serious about organising our way of life across the era – not the next election or market cycle, not in our lifetime or even the lifetimes of our grandchildren, or even the next 200 years. If humanity are now the dominant influence on the ecology of our planet then we must aim to create a paradise which will last, as you say, “for the next million years for starters.”
Long-term thinking may be foolish with regards to technology, as the pace of progress can mean that by the time a plan is being put into action the technology envisioned to play a central part is obsolete. But with ecology this is not so. The Holocene has lasted more than 11,000 years, and the kindred living things we share our planet with developed their biological and ecological functioning over many millions of years (or even billions of years, for things like the algae which produce most of the oxygen we breath) – our lives depend on many of these beings continuing to function in more or less the same way they have for this enormous amout of time. So organising our way of life with an ultra long-term view so that we are in effect in harmony with them is eminently sensible and at the very least a necessary act of self-preservation.
Here your placement of food and farming right at the centre of it all comes clearly into view. The food we eat is perhaps the most direct contact we have with living things – taking them inside us and making their bodies our own – and most of the 8 billion of us are accustomed to do it multiple times a day with a whole range of parts of living things. The way we obtain our food has massive rammifications for life on earth. There are many examples of human civilisations who have obtained their food in a way that supports ecological abundance – e.g. Homegardens in SE Asia, the Qanat canal and oases system in Iran, nomadic bison hunters in NW America. Life can flourish around human beings who have learnt how to best fit our needs with our ecology. Great progress in understanding the ecology of our planet can give rise to great design of food systems than can sustain us for the next million years for starters, and bring about an age of ecological abundance. There are lots of exciting contemporary examples of Agroforestry systems, Composite Cross Populations and Rotational Grazing systems with poultry and long rest periods. Again the question of the means to the alternative comes up here as until recently most farmers in the UK have been considerably restricted from adopting these systems, no matter how much they like the idea.
As you say “…utopia by definition is always out of reach” In fact this is the very reason for its value. If we observe our motivations closely we can see that ideals have great power for endowing action with meaning. Ideals give direction. They make progress possible to define. Furthermore they draw people to act to create a better world. David Hume’s beautiful critique of rationality was that is has no direction without motivating feeling. We need collective ideals more than ever, to inspire people to work together to build a world we want to live-in, rather than hurtle into oblivion pursuing our own interests under the illusion of isolation.
Your Great Rethink lays a solid foundation on which to build that vision. I will respond to each section in turn…
Leave a Reply